|
¡¡
[ÇöÀçÀ§Ä¡]: Ȩ>
Áø·á°ú¸ñº°
ºÐ·ù> ÀÀ±ÞÀÇÇÐ> ¼Ò¾Æ
ÀÀ±ÞȯÀÚÀÇ ÀÇ·á»ç°í
¼Ò¾Æ ÀÀ±ÞȯÀÚÀÇ ÀÇ·á»ç°í
¡¡
-
Selbst SM, Friedman MJ, Singh SB.
Epidemiology and etiology of
malpractice lawsuits involving children in US emergency departments and
urgent care centers.
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2005
Mar;21(3):165-9.
-
Áúȯº° ºóµµ(ºóµµº° ¼ø¼)
-
³ú¼ö¸·¿°
-
Ãæ¼ö¿°
-
À§ÆÈ»À °ñÀý(»ó¹Ú°ñ °ñÀý)
-
¾Æ·¡ÆÈ»À °ñÀý(³ë»À ȤÀº ÀÚ»À °ñÀý, ¿ä°ñ ȤÀº ô°ñ °ñÀý)
-
°íȯ²¿ÀÓ(°íȯ¿°Àü, testicular torsion)
-
³Ò´Ù¸®»À °ñÀý(´ëÅð°ñ °ñÀý)
-
¾Æ·§´Ù¸®»À °ñÀý(Á¤°»À ȤÀº Á¾¾Æ¸®»À °ñÀý, °æ°ñ ȤÀº ºñ°ñ °ñÀý)
-
½Å»ý¾Æ ½Å°æÇÐÀû ¼Õ»ó(neurologically impaired newborn)
-
¹è¿Í °ñ¹ÝºÎÀ§¿Í °ü·ÃµÈ ±âŸ Áõ»ó(other symptoms involving the abdomen and
pelvis)
-
Æó·Å
-
³ªÀ̺° ÁúȯÀÇ ºÐÆ÷
-
| ¡¡ |
First |
Second |
Third |
| 0-2¼¼ |
³ú¼ö¸·¿° |
½Å»ý¾Æ ½Å°æÇÐÀû ¼Õ»ó |
Æó·Å |
| 3-5¼¼ |
°ñÀý |
³ú¼ö¸·¿° |
Ãæ¼ö¿° |
| 6-11¼¼ |
°ñÀý |
Ãæ¼ö¿° |
³ú¼ö¸·¿° |
| 12-17¼¼ |
°ñÀý |
Ãæ¼ö¿° |
°íȯ²¿ÀÓ |
-
10´ë °ú½ÇÀ¯Çü
-
| ¡¡ |
¼ÕÇØ¹è»ó û±¸ °Ç¼ö(Number of claims) N=2132 |
Àüü °Ç¼ö¿¡¼ÀÇ ºñÀ² |
| Áø´Ü°ú½Ç(Diagnostic error) |
832 |
39 |
| °ú½Ç ¾øÀ½(No medical error) |
391 |
18 |
| ½Ã¼úÀÇ ¼ú±âºÎÁ·(Improper performance of procedure) |
386 |
18 |
| °¨µ¶°ú½Ç(failure to supervise other staff) |
120 |
6 |
| ÀÀ±Þóġ ȤÀº ½Ã¼úÀÇ ¹Ì½ÃÇà(Resuscitation/procedure not done) |
95 |
4 |
| Ä¡·áÁö¿¬(Delay in treatment) |
84 |
4 |
| Åõ¾à°ú½Ç(Medication error) |
63 |
3 |
| ÀÔ¿øÀûÀÀÀÇ Åð¿øÁ¶Ä¡(failure to admit to hospital) |
57 |
3 |
| ÇùÁø ȤÀº Àü¿ø°ú½Ç |
53 |
3 |
| ºÎÀûÁ¤ÇÑ Ã³Ä¡(failure to respond appropriately) |
51 |
2 |
-
¼ÕÇØ¹è»ó û±¸ÀÇ °á°ú
-
|
°á°ú |
ºñÀ²(%) |
| ¼Ò¼Û ½ÃÀÛ ÈÄ ÈÇØ(settled after litigation began) |
47 |
| ¼Ò¼Û ½ÃÀÛ Àü ÈÇØ(settled before litigation began) |
29 |
| ÃëÇÏ(case dropped) |
9 |
| ±â°¢(settled by court) |
7(dismissed by action of court) |
| ¿ø°íÆÐ¼Ò(judgment for defendant) |
6 |
| ¿ø°í½Â¼Ò(judgment for plaintiff) |
1 |
| ÁßÀç(mediation) |
1 |
-
¼Ò¾ÆÀÇ ¹«¸¼Õ»ó Áø´Ü Performance of a decision rule for radiographs of
pediatric knee injuries.
-
Although decision rules for
radiographs of pediatric knee injuries have been suggested from
retrospective studies, prospective evaluations of such rules have
been limited.
-
We sought to prospectively
assess the performance of a rule in children presenting with acute
knee injuries. Eligible participants were children aged 3-18 years
with an acute knee injury.
-
The settings for the study
were a tertiary pediatric emergency department (ED), a community
hospital ED, and a pediatric urgent care center.
-
All of the participants
received standard knee radiographs.
-
½Åü°Ë»ç (Before radiography,
each patient was assessed by a pediatrician or pediatric emergency
physician for presence of the following)
-
1) üÁßÁöÅÊ ºÒ°¡(inability to
bear weight)
-
2) ¹«¸ÀÇ 90µµ ±¸ºÎ¸² ºÒ°¡(inability
to flex the knee to 90 degrees)
-
3) ¾ÐÅë(presence of bony
tenderness)
-
The radiographs were
interpreted by a radiologist blinded to the study; those with
findings reported as consistent with acute fracture were considered
positive.
-
A total of 146 patients
were enrolled (65% male, mean age 11.6 years).
-
Of these, 15 (10.3%) had a
fracture on their radiograph, 6 of which were related to trampoline
use.
-
Seventy-seven (53%) were
negative for criterion 1 (i.e., able to bear weight immediately
after the accident and in the ED), none (0%) of whom had fractures.
-
The negative predictive
value of this criterion was 1.0 (95% CI 0.94-1.0).
-
The positive predictive
value was 0.22 (95% CI 0.13-0.34).
-
The sensitivity was 1.0
(95% CI 0.82-1.0).
-
The specificity was 0.59
(95% CI 0.50-0.67).
-
Three patients negative for
criterion 3 were found to have fractures.
-
The proximal tibia was the
most common fracture site (47%).
-
In conclusion, assessment
of the ability to bear weight would have decreased the use of
radiography by 53% without missing any fractures in our study
population. No additional value to the rule was found by adding
assessment of the ability to flex the knee or bony tenderness.
-
J Emerg Med. 2005; 28(3):257-61
-
Âü°í¹®Çå ¹× À¥»çÀÌÆ®
-
±âŸ
¡¡
| |
|